HP World ’99 Paper  5275

IT PLANNING CHALLENGES

 

Sebastian Lobato Ocampo

Chief Information Officer

Girsa Corporativo, S.A. de C.V.

Paseo de Tamarindos 400 B – 31

Bosques de las Lomas

11700 Mexico, D.F.

Mexico

Tel: (525) 723-2862

slobato@mail.girsa.com.mx

 

 

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

Strategic IS planning is one of the most important responsibilities of a CIO. It is a tool that provides direction to the work executed in the IT area, looking to support the company in the achievement of key business objectives. To be effectively carried on, IT strategic planning has to be conducted with attention to many factors, some of them are evidently technological, but many others come from the business side.

 

As of today, IT has failed to meet business expectations in many cases. Such failure has provoked severe disruptions in the process of applying IT to business processes and to a wide disconnect between how CEOs and CIOs perceive the value of technology and how it should be applied in the company for the construction process of competitive advantage.

 

Globalization of markets and the recent upcoming of the new digital economy represent compounded challenges to the traditional problem of linking business strategies with IT projects. CIOs now have duties much more related to the competitiveness of their respective companies than ever before. Such duties have to deal with issues as the ones included in the following list:

ü       Organizational design and effectiveness.

ü       Identification of key business opportunities.

ü       Development of computing literacy among top management members and end users, as well as business literacy among IT people.

ü       Resources definition and administration.

ü       Risk management.

ü       Grasping of new technologies, their assimilation and application into business processes, while caring that investment previously done in IT is preserved and fully utilized.

 

The primary focus of IT work is shifting from the previous emphasis on the search for efficiency and productivity improvements towards a search for real value creation through processes effectiveness and business competitiveness.  The purpose of this paper is to discuss how can all these issues be tackled and how we can gain leverage of IT in building the organization of the future, showing an example in a chemical conglomerate of companies.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

There are several edges that have to be revised when analyzing how IT has been applied to the business and what results have been obtained from such a process:

 

1.       Disconnect between CEOs and CIOs.  There has been a traditional disconnection between CEOs and CIOs regarding the opportunities that should be explored in the process of defining the future business.

 

This gap particularly exists in their respective perception about the real value of technology and how it should leverage the company in the construction process of competitive advantage. The disconnection leads to conflicting relationships not only between these characters, but also between the CIO and the rest of the executives of the company.

 

Such disconnection is also reflected in the fact that most boards have specific committees overseeing critical functions such as finance, human resources, manufacturing and marketing. These committees, in most of the cases, are personally conducted by the CEO and counts with active participation and contribution of top officers, thus establishing a clear sign, to the whole organization, of the importance of such issues for the survival of the company.

 

However, very few companies have committees that deal with IT strategies, projects and key decisions, leading to put such decisions only in the minds of technical people.

 

The hypothesis established in the late 70s and early 80s, about the expected development of professional career for CIOs (named MIS managers, then), used to forecast bright promotions in the fast track for them. Such theory took firm grounds in those years, because it was believed that the broad perspective and multidisciplinary experience that the CIO would acquire dealing practically with all key functions of the organization would lead him / her to become a key executive and a business leader in short time.

 

The reality is that this has been true only in very few exceptional cases. Today, there is a disappointing low rate of CEOs (or any similar position of major responsibility) with careers developed under the MIS umbrella.

 

Even more, as of today, in very few cases the CIO is really involved and takes active participation in defining business strategies with the rest of his / her peers. Traditionally, CIO decisions are only those related to the acquisition, development and deployment of technology in the organization.

 

2.       Business value of IT.  It is a common place to hear that IT has failed to meet expectations in several industries; very probably this is derived from a combination of unrealistic expectations from top management and a lack of abilities, from MIS executives, to effectively articulate the information technology with key business opportunities. It is clear that information technology does not provide business value by itself, it has to be applied to better business practices.

 

Sometimes, specially when IT is applied by brute force, it makes things much more complex, more frustrating for end users and, sadly, much more expensive. Having an old and cumbersome process where new technologies are applied, ends up in a cumbersome process, whose operation is compounded by the technology, deriving for sure, in a runaway project.

 

IT application in business’ history is plenty of runaway projects, which run over budget and behind schedule; in most of such cases, these projects are cancelled by the CEO. There are different sources to such projects: (a) they are initiated by technical reasons rather than business or strategic ones; (b) end users are not involved in key decisions; (c) there is no commitment from top management to these projects or (d) it is a combination of more than one of the previously mentioned reasons.

 

In the global world of the new digital economy context, information technology is interwoven within business strategy in a way never seen before, however, if technology fails it can damage the core business as never done before.

 

3.       Changing markets.  Today’s companies face fierce competition in most of the markets, reflecting depressing prices, increasing
      customers expectations and volatile financial markets. Globalization is leading to mergers and acquisitions in all industries; the
      digital economy is reshaping the competitive forces in most of the industries.

 The 2nd. Annual WEF Global CEO Survey conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers shows that up to 60% of CEOs dedicate a large amount of personal attention to issues related to mergers and acquisitions of operations, while about 65% are foreseeing threats from non-traditional competitors entering into their markets, coming from the Internet arena. On the other hand, about a fifth part of them consider that their company’s revenues will be increased in a 20% or more, in the upcoming five years, because of e-commerce.

 

4.       The state of strategy.  The uses of formal strategic planning processes in corporations have derived in mixed results. Faulty preparation and poor execution procedures seem to be the most common reason of these results; however, the end product is that in many corporations strategic planning efforts have been drastically reduced in the early 90s.

 

Gary Hammel and C.K. Prahalad have established that current strategy models lead to a pathology of the ever catch-up game (Strategic Intent, Harvard Business Review); because in so may cases, companies try only to replicate proven successful strategies applied by their competitors.

 

Sometimes, when corporate vision is not clearly established, strategic models enter in collision course with demands of value creation from shareholders. This inevitably provokes unnecessary stress among the members of top management.

 

Style of corporate governance will necessarily determine the approach in which IT should be applied. It is frequent to find that corporate governance style is not clear to all members of the company, leading to mixed behavior and poor execution results.

 

5.       The digital economy. The universal connectivity provided by Internet is redefining all forms of business systems and structures, as well as social interaction among communities. The most profound impacts are in both fields, economic and cultural.

 

Internet technology is becoming the common base of operation within and between enterprises. In the 70s and 80s, companies based their competitiveness on R&D and marketing  (operating basically as centralized organizations), now increasingly decentralized companies (and quickly moving to distributed schemes) are trying to establish their emphasis around IT.

 

The digital economy shows elements based on key factors that determine how the companies should operate from now, on: (a) change; (b) speed and (c) complexity. Enterprises can conduct their business without physical facilities, such as the case of the ever-present examples of Amazon.com and Yahoo.com; even more, their market capitalization does not depend anymore on tangible assets.

 

New technologies integrated within the digital economy allow companies to provide massive personalization services to a huge amount of customers, reshaping the core competencies of the organizations. Within this context, local presence in a determined market is not a privilege anymore (barely can be defined as a competing tool).

 

Now customers do not perceive value from products based on atoms, but from those based on bits and information content, opening doors to business opportunities never imagined before.

 

IT should be a key player supporting organizational efforts to take advantage of these changes.

 

 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS

 

In companies making the transition to the Century XXI it is necessary to have specific IT strategic planning efforts because there is an accelerated trend of growth in IT spending (problem compounded by the Y2K issue) and it’s increasing impact on organizational competitiveness and business results. For perspective, in 1991 US total capital spending on IT exceeded for the very first time to capital machinery and equipment spending; now has a share of more than 50% of business equipment capital spending.

 

According to Charles B. Wang, CEO of Computer Associates, IT is a fundamental force in reshaping organizations by applying investments in computing and communications to promote competitive advantage, customer service and other strategic benefits

 

Companies should prepare technology strategies and execute them with basis on strategic enterprise-wide initiatives, taking advantage of business planning cycle and with full involvement and commitment of top management. The framework of such strategic planning process needs to include vision, strategy and implementation action plans.

 

To complement IT planning efforts, to eliminate the disconnect between the CIO and their business counterparts, as well as to help companies leverage the technology, the following steps must be considered:

 

A.      Increase CIO participation in strategic planning sessions and day-to-day management business decisions.
B.      Establish an IT Committee to discuss and define how IT has to be applied to the business; company’s CEO
      must be the chairman of this team and CIO the administrator.

C.      Decentralize and disperse IT resources.

D.      Raise levels of computing literacy among business people and business literacy among IT people.

E.      Promote end-user computing.

F.      When applicable, try to align it deployment efforts with TQ efforts.

G.     Establish an evolutionary, not revolutionary approach; especially in terms on spending rates, infrastructure
      deployment and previous investments protection.

 

This process helps in changing the traditional reactive IT deployment work (which responds only to urgent organization’s demands) to a proactive focus, which strategically drafts a plan for IT development and application as a basis for new business initiatives. This proactive approach serves as preventive methodology for TQM, as discussed later in this paper.

 

One of the important features of a global CIO in current companies is to be perceived, among his / her peers, as a key business consultant. Within this context, it is extremely important to align not only general strategic planning efforts, but also IT strategies, to the corporate governance style that has been adopted by the company. There are mainly three different styles, which lead to centralized, decentralized and even distributed operating schemes: (a) strategic planning; (b) strategic control and (c) financial control.

 

The behavior that corporate headquarters will show regarding the business units operations, depends largely on the style adopted, which is reflected in two main dimensions (see figure #  1):

 

1.       Planning influence. The degree in which strategy is centrally determined.

2.       Control influence.  The degree in which short-term financial goals are centrally enforced.

 

IT will not be the exception to these forces, thus the planning approach must be aligned with them to be actionable. Otherwise, they could cause severe conflicts with the operations of the business units.

 


 


Figure 1. - Strategic management styles determine how strategic planning tasks are carried out.

 

 

The ideal forum to discuss how IT spending should be done, how IT infrastructure should be deployed and which applications will be considered as business priorities is an executive committee designed exclusively to deal with these critical issues.

 

What is really intended with these decisions, is to use technology as a trigger for a real change in the way business is conducted by the company. With an IT committee personally chaired by the CEO, business sense of the decision-making process is assured. Additionally, the contribution of function managers is essential given that they face all kind of business problems on a day-to-day basis, providing a customer orientation in the IT development.

 

A consistent operation of this kind of business team has to lead to the consolidation of a computing and information culture in the company; however, specific steps and goals for computing literacy have to be drafted to assure it. CEOs and top executives have to feel comfortable using technical terms and especially technical concepts; the only reasonable way to achieve this is to apply information technology to solve business problems or improve business processes. On the other hand, IT people have to be comfortable using business terminology and specially business concepts to solve IT issues

 

Top management and end users with solid computing literacy show an attitude towards technology that goes beyond to the ability of using PCs and specific software or applications. Business people with proper IT preparation reflect users that are eager to lead those projects that traditionally are considered technical ones and left in the hands of IT people. By this way, those projects lead by function managers but with close cooperation of IT managers are typically much more focused on the business benefits than on technical aspects.

 

Some universities have taken responsibility of preparing tomorrow’s executives with these skills. In Mexico, ITESM is one of the most prestigious universities, currently has 27 premises in 26 of the biggest cities in the country. Its virtual system of education has 40,000 students within 13 postgraduate programs, as compared with 80,000 students under traditional systems.  ITESM aims to have its whole student population using laptops as regular learning tool by 2001

 

Technology infrastructure deployment is another area of key attention; following Metcalfe’s law, strategic planning efforts should include specific tasks to build decentralized, disperse and appropriately networked IT resources, as the basis to increase collaboration across the organization.

 

In those enterprises where Total Quality Management is a central part of strategic work, IT has to be managed and fully aligned with the company’s TQ model to effectively support its focus. It is interesting to note that those companies with solid TQ principles (i.e. winners of the Malcolm Baldridge Quality Award) consistently show strong IT strategies and superior business results.

 

When is strategically managed (in the terms described in this paper) IT is a key component in at least five out of eight factors of the model used in the Malcolm Baldridge, Juran Quality Prize and many other total quality systems operating worldwide:

 

FACTOR

STRATEGIC IMPACT

Information & analysis

Ø  Providing reliable, timely and consistent data collection
  mechanisms to the quality model.

Ø  Establishing the basis for information analysis process.

Ø  Facilitating the methods to translate markets information into real
  knowledge.

Personnel development

Ø IT people acting as internal business consultants, aiming to improve processes, products and services.

Process management

ØSystematic management of business key processes.

Ø Detailed attention to how finished goods & services are produced and delivered to customers; how procurement functions are implemented; how quality is assured and how customers’ requirements are met.

Ø Achieving operating excellence through quality design and a preventive approach in business processes.

Superior value to the client

Ø Providing methodology to know the customers, provide products & services according their requirements and measure their satisfaction.

Ø Offering personalized services to customers

Business results

Ø Developing and implementing only those IT projects that really add value to the customer and deliver tangible benefits (i.e. those with superior  ROI rates)

 

 

Articulating TQ and IT strategies with basis on consistent business definitions, needs and requirements, determines in technological terms, the way in which the business is conducted by the company:

 

ü       Identifying new services to be supplied to the customers.

ü       Integrating more robust supply-chain flows of material and information.

ü       Establishing new distribution channels.

ü       Identifying new markets.

ü       Expanding organizational boundaries.

ü       Establishing new methodologies for knowledge grasping and management.

 

IT strategic planning process requires similar methodology to those used when a business strategic plan is prepared. Alignment of approach and articulation of action steps through Integrated Business Planning:

1.       Develop a business alignment matrix

· Identify CSF

· Set goals

· Develop performance indicators

· Develop targets

2.       Develop a preliminary business plan

3.       Develop process improvement plan

4.       Develop the operations plan

5.       Develop the resource plan

6.       Develop optional other supporting plan

7.       Conduct periodic business plan reviews

IT STRATEGIC PLANNING IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY

To illustrate the issues discussed in the previous section, I will use an example from the chemical industry: GIRSA is a Mexican petrochemical conglomerate of companies. Eight different business units integrate it, each one producing different goods and materials, some of them are for the end consumer, but most are raw materials (i.e. carbon black, synthetic rubber, polystyrene… etc) used to produce other goods. The Group has sales in excess of $800.0MM USD.

The company used to work in a tightly centralized scheme, so MIS was also organized around a central department, providing service to the whole corporation. This meant that all business units used to shared technological infrastructure, business applications, office automation devices and learning resources, although their operations and markets were very different. Corporate governance was focused on a planning process centrally prepared and executed.

In 1992 the corporate governance style changed to a very decentralized one. Each business unit acquired a large degree of autonomy, looking for flexibility and responsiveness to dynamic markets. From that point on, each business unit began to operate independently of each other; corporate management style moved to a emphasis on financial control.

 

IT strategies switched to the decentralized scheme too, dispersing MIS department‘s human and technical resources among the business units, creating their respective MIS areas and IT infrastructure with the intention of having self-sufficient business divisions.

 

From the technology standpoint, in each facility an HP3000 was installed to process their information using desegregated applications. They began to send and receive general ledger transactions for consolidating and financial information purposes (for further reference, you can see “Processing and integration of Business Information from Decentralized operations”, Interex 93 Proceedings).

 

As every MIS area began to work independently, different strategies arose: some business units established an internal applications development approach, while others decided to rely on commercial software. Some business units assigned top priority to the definition of IT strategies, while others considered IT as a merely operating issue.

 

As a result, the applications portfolio of the Group began to change (especially in terms of diversification). On the other hand, LANs grew on each one of business units’ facilities, the WAN changed to allow TCP/IP traffic and expanded bandwidth, open architectures were adopted so a mixture of UNIX, Windows NT and MPE platforms coexist within resource administration problems and high cost of ownership.

 

An increasing rate of IT spending and mixed results of IT application to business units has been the final product; in some cases, new client / server applications are in full operation, while others still operated until recent months in legacy systems (incidentally, Y2K non-compliant). It is interesting to say that those business units with strong TQ culture, were the ones that began to take real advantage of information technology. Furthermore, the gap among business units and their approach to apply IT has been greater every day; this is a dead weight that hampers the Group’s competitiveness.

 

Considering the management style followed by the Group, a framework of corporate policies and specific strategies were prepared to reinforce how the business units take advantage of IT. We identified four strategic elements of information technology deployment, to be used as basis for a diagnostics of the current position, as well as to rule strategy settings in every business unit, as well as to the whole Group:

 

A.      Technology & infrastructure. Assure that IT devices (namely, hardware) are sufficient, updated and properly deployed to meet corporate’s needs. It evaluates the foundation to support future projects, as well as the ability to execute utility applications with efficiency.

B.      Connectivity. Assure that interoperability among applications is in place through specific methods, devices and mediums; it has to be installed for data, voice and image exchange among all business unit’s premises.

C.      Systematization.  Assure that the company has a clear vision on which applications will support key business processes and provide the basis for their continuous improvement.

D.      Computing & information literacy.  Assure that the company counts with a critical mass of people, who have the know-how, are eager and willing to take advantage of IT possibilities to solve business problems.

 

IT strategies were crafted by each business units around these four elements and discussed not only in their respective IT committees but also at the board of directors. Figure No. 2 shows an example of the diagnostic of one of the business unit. A similar chart is used to project how these elements will behave in the future, with basis on the opportunities already identified in each one of them, as well as on the strategic direction that each business unit has defined.

 

Evidently all these efforts have raised the level of discussion regarding IT. On one hand, business strategies are the basis to define IT strategies and, on the other, each project has to be justified on the basis of real benefits that are going to be provided to the business, before being formally approved.

 

It is important to say that now there is an information technology committee in each one of the business units, personally chaired by the corresponding managing director. One of the key duties of such committee is to keep track of the progress on the strategic actions agreed with the board.

 

As a complementary effort, some ratios were adopted to assure that indicators about process effectiveness, infrastructure deployment and business results would serve as guidance systems. Among the ratios implemented I can mention the following as examples:

 

Technology indicators:

· Volume of PCs as compared to employees requiring them (# of employees / PC)

· Volume of PCs linked in a network

· Percentage of obsolescence in equipment used (according to a corporate criteria)

· Bandwidth installed / bandwidth required

Process indicators:

· IT services availability (service factor)

· Software licenses sufficiency

· Volume of access visits to the corporate intranet

·         Applications response time  vs. goal

Economic indicators

· IT spending (expenses) / total operating expenses

· IT spending (expenses plus investment) / sales

 


Figure 2. - Chart of IT elements diagnostic per business unit.

The approach of establishing IT strategies in terms of these four key elements have forced top management of each business units to pay attention to every one and balance efforts among them, with basis on the perspective provided by their respective business strategy.

In the case of infrastructure, for instance, specific decisions about how to preserve the investment done in previous years have been made, along with the ones regarding to new acquisitions. Economy is very important and in our corporation to extend the life of the current HP3000 platform is a must; it is important to highlight that investment considers not only the value of the computers in operation, but also the knowledge created in IT people about the platform as well.

There are about 18 MPE/ix machines in the Group and while most of them were recently still used only for running legacy applications. These technology strategies have allowed us to draft action programs to leverage them as file & printing servers, as well as Intranet / Extranet central repositories (see typical infrastructure of a business unit in figure # 3).

 

Given that mission-critical applications in all the business units have been replaced by open ERP systems based on client / server architectures, all of them require to have mechanisms in place to assure access to past data (for fiscal purposes mainly). Assigning these equipments a new mission, such as described in the previous paragraph, grants us that proper updated systems will be always in place, while access to past data is provided in a natural way (Windows), rather than thorugh terminal emulators.

 

Having attendance to HP World on a regular basis has provided us with the first-hand knowledge about the tools and technology evolution to establish these multiple-environment platforms within a reliable network administration. Just is the case of SAMBA, which was installed and tested during 1997/98, allowing us to provide file & printing services from these environments, as well as natural networking services provided in MPE/ix and HP-UX, avoiding terminal emulation.

 

 

 


 

 


Figure 3.- Typical multiple-environment infrastructure in GIRSA’s business units.

 

 

Regarding which applications and services install in HP3000 platform to extend their useful life, in a paper presented at HP World 97 and documented as part of the Proceedings (“Intranet as a corporate communications tool”), we described how we implemented an Intranet as a key application. At the present time a HP9000 and a HP3000 are both Intranet Servers and are working fine with very good results. Figure # 4 shows the Intranet in operation (named SING because of the initials in Spanish of  “GIRSA Intranet System”).

 

In the field of systematization, an applications portfolio analysis has been conducted to define which ones were the candidates to be replaced, in an operating and strategic context, beyond the purely needs of Y2K. This analysis was conducted with basis on the critical success factors of the markets in which each business unit participates, aiming to a real strategic vision  on how IT will contribute to company’s competitiveness.

 

As a result of these efforts, a portfolio of projects was drafted in each business unit, to be used as an implementation program guide. In some cases of similar projects in different business units, we promoted a common project among them, looking for synergies focused as an operation of common services, rather than a centralization of IT functions (it would be against the management style adopted by our corporation).

 

 


 

 


Figure 4. - GIRSA  Intranet running on MPE/ix environment.

 

 

The area of computing & information literacy is one of the most important ones because it defines whether the company has an organization capable of leveraging the technology or not. Within this, there are action steps to be taken to assure that the company counts with properly prepared employees. They should have enough IT skills related not only to abilities on how to use PCs, office automation tools and specific applications, but also to become a change agent, capable of leading IT projects as business oriented ones.

 

 We have defined a computing & information literacy map that defines what are the minimum skills required to cover each one of the knowledge areas that each one of the different kind of users should have. We have classified users in three kinds, for role definition purposes, as follows:

 

A.      Managing directors and members of business units’ top management; corporate officers. Those considered as sponsors of IT development and deployment.

B.      Middle managers. All those that can be responsible of leading an IT project; they are also typically ultimate responsible of quality of transactions operated by others through company’s applications.

C.      Clerks and unionized workers. All those that typically execute transactions capturing data, launching computer jobs and running specific functions of the applications.

 

Knowledge areas are defined as those technology subjects, themes, operation of IT services and applications that guide how to use and take advantage of IT for business purposes. These represent knowledge required to be a key contributor to the group’s competitiveness.

 

The computing & information literacy map helps in identification of gaps existing between the knowledge level required and the skills actually shown per knowledge area. Figure # 5 shows an example of such diagnostic.

 

 

 


 

 

 

 


Figure 5. - Computing & information literacy map.

 

 

Specific programs for business literacy among IT people are also under operation; our model for quality management is one of the key vehicles we use to provide hands-on training to IT people on how to understand customers’ requirements and environment, financial analysis, business systems and the rationale for business strategies. These are fundamental components of business sense.

 

Having a specific program for business literacy development is especially important. Gartner Group (1998) forecasts, with a .70 of probability, that by 2002, pure technical skills will represent only 35% (out of a current 65%) of the expertise of internal IS work force in more than 50% of large enterprises.  This will be the result of a fundamental change in the nature of the role of the IT organization; it will move from a direct provider of technology services, to become a broker and internal integrator of shared services.

 

As of to this point, we’ve presented how we approach the definition process of IT strategies with basis on the business strategies but now it is imperative to discuss two specific areas of internal IS work that are critical for the successful preparation and execution of IT strategies: (a) definition of operating practices around insourcing and outsourcing to meet company’s demand and (b) organizational design and deployment of IT human resources.

 

Establishing a balance between insourcing and outsourcing practices begins with a definition of the level of internal IT people structure. This is a matter of capacity planning and the associated costs to such decision; along with this, typically goes the deci9sion about to use or not outsourcing resources.

 

Business strategy theorists say that structures have to follow strategies. IT is not the exception to such rule; it is necessary to identify the real level of demand and its two variations: fixed (semi-fixed in reality) and variable, which could lead to lost strategic opportunities or overhead, depending how the human structure is set up, such as figure # 6 illustrates. 

 

 

 


Figure 6. - Impact of IT structure definition on approaches to meet internal customers’ demand.

 

 


In line with this point are those decisions related to how and where to use outsourcing resources; there are some key reasons that drive this kind of decisions: (a) IT operating costs control; (b) gain access to world-class competencies; (c) risks sharing; (d) cash injection; (e) internal resources scarcity… etc.

 

Although some companies have decided to use a full outsourcing practice, and some others virtually meet all the demand via insourcing, we believe that a selective outsourcing provides an excellent complement of competencies. As Gartner Group has established (1998), by 2002, 50% of the IS work force will be contract or external workers; on the other hand, IDC forecasts that 70% of companies that have contracted outsourcing services to solve Y2K issues, will continue using such services after such problem is gone.

 

Organizational design for IS departments should follow principles of preparation of high performance organizations (structure, rewards, tasks, decision making, information and people) attending both rational and emotional sides because, after all, strong leadership is a key component of successful business and IT strategies.

 

Using the scheme of IT strategies definition with basis on the four elements, complemented by efforts on the consistent operation of IT committees have provided us with valuable benefits. It has allowed us to reduce the nuisance generated by the decentralization of business and IS operations, as well as to close the gap existing between the group of business units with better IT leverage with those business units that don’t have such level.

 

Evidently we still have a long way to walk in the generation of business opportunities application with basis on information technology, but we think we are on the right direction. A relevant progress in the application of IT has been achieved, moving our organization towards IT applications with more value added, thus reinforcing our competitive position.  Figure # 7 shows how chemical industry is doing in terms of value creation from IT strategies, according a model prepared by the MIT.

 

 


 


Figure 7. - IT strategy levels (MIT model).

 

 

Among our main opportunity areas (which by definition are part of our working programs), I can mention the following: (a) reinforce business literacy among IT people; (b) establish a competence center for common services and (c) reinforce participation and commitment from top management in all business units. A much more competitive GIRSA will raise from this work.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

The role and nature of the IS areas is changing dramatically because of the new dynamics of the markets, the emerging opportunities originated by the digital economies and the accelerated development of information technologies, but the responsibilities about IT resources management will remain.

 

IT strategic planning efforts and company wide strategic planning processes have to be intimately linked and synchronized (this is, a specific sequence has to be followed to achieve effectiveness and to consider funding and budgeting approval). A complete system should include action steps to assure that IT strategic planning generates quality products as input for the business strategic planning.

 

Thorough work has to be done to reach a truly business position for IT people (especially, in the case of the CIO); this obviously implies that they must acquire strong business sense and skills.

 

IT strategic planning has to share the business vision of the general strategic planning of the corporation. The strategic plan of information technology represents the allocation of the IT resources to achieve the best business results towards that common vision. IT strategic planning can be painful. Several basic assumptions about IS processes and operation (otherwise considered as “given”) have to be examined and challenged during the strategic plan preparation process.

 

As Bill Gates establishes in his new book (“Business @ the speed of thought”), companies will change more in the next 10 years than in the previous 50 and IT will be at the center stage. Lots of opportunities are in the upcoming months to position information technology as a key supplier of business value; however, it is important to mention that there are also severe risks to face since IT is now in the position of damaging, when abused, to practically any business.

 

As shown in figure # 7 strategic planning for information technology has to be focused and lead to delivering applications with more business value; from purely oriented towards cost and expense reduction, to productivity improvement & payback focus, to the ones that genuinely redefine our business.

 

However this is going to be a tough track. Gartner Group forecasted in 1998 (with a rate of 0.9 probability) that by 2000, 75% of enterprises that attempt to create integrated business / technology architectures will fail to reach their goals because they will not have created a viable process for communicating and governing its implementation. It is imperative to be part of the 25% that will succeed.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Computer Technology Research Corp.  INFORMATION SYSTEMS STRATEGIC PLANNING report. Computer Technology Research Corp., 1994 fourth printing (ISBN 1-56607-020-1)

 

Donovan, John J. OPPORTUNITIES IN TECHNOLOGY Handbook for implementing strategic advantage trough technology. Cambridge Technology Group, 1991

 

Donovan, John J. THE SECOND INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: Reinventing your business on the Web. Prentice-Hall, 1997 (ISBN 0-13-745621-2)

 

Gates, William H.  BUSINESS AT THE SPEED OF THOUGHT. Business in the digital era. Warner Books, 1999 (ISBN 0-553-06101-1)

 

Johnson, James R. THE SOFTWARE FACTORY: Managing Software Development & Maintenance. QED Information Sciences Inc., 1991 (ISBN 0-89435-348-9)

 

Spitzer,  R. D.  TQM: The only Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Quality Progress, 1993 (No. 26 June)

 

Wang, Charles B. TECHNOVISION The executive's survival guide to understanding and managing information technology. McGraw-Hill, 1994 (ISBN 0-07-068155-4)

 

 

Author | Title | Track | Home

Send email to Interex or to the Webmaster
©Copyright 1999 Interex. All rights reserved.